BASF’s corporate website – www.basf.com - is the most complete and web savvy in the field of online sustainability communications. Jungle Rating – a Dutch internet consultancy – concludes this after having investigated all sustainability websites of the European sustainability leaders, listed on the DJSI STOXX index. The short list of the top 53 companies has been announced today.
The aim of Jungle Rating’s online sustainability research is to provide insight in the way European sustainability leading companies - listed on the DJSI STOXX index - use their corporate website to communicate on their sustainability performance.
The research consists of:
BASF obtains the first place in the ranking, with a score of 67%. BASF publishes topical information (news and case study updates) and offers complete GRI-based performance information, very useful for the professional user groups (socially responsible investors and analysts).
The website also contains several unique features, such as case study videos, flash animations, downloadable Excel sheets and interactive graphs. Tanja Castor, responsible for the sustainability section on www.BASF.com explains that: “sustainability is one of the four strategic guidelines at BASF, so it is extremely important to communicate about it”.
Among the close followers, Centrica’s extensive CSR video interview section and BP’s carbon calculator (enables visitors to calculate their CO2 footprint) must not go unmentioned.
Geert Jan Grimberg, internet consultant at Jungle Rating: “the best performers provide complete and topical information, but also make use of the unique possibilities the web offers in terms of multimedia (e.g. video, rich internet) and personalisation (e.g. interactive graphs, downloadable Excel sheets)”. Very few companies use their corporate website to facilitate a stakeholder dialogue, by means of a weblog or periodical chat sessions.
Based on this research Jungle Rating foresees a number of trends:
The research also incorporated an online survey. In the end, 17 out of all 53 companies participated. The results of the 17 participants confirms the belief that the corporate website is the primary communications channel for communicating on their sustainability performance. Companies indicate that case studies, the incorporation of multimedia, an HTML report and interactive graphs and charting tools are high on the online sustainability agenda in the next two years.
In order to assess the quality of online communications, Jungle Rating developed the Online Communications Quality model (OCQ model). The OCQ model has been drawn up after many interviews with corporate stakeholders, like financial stakeholders ((SRI) investors & analysts) journalists, investors, NGO’s and job seekers. We distinguish:
The model measures the quality of online sustainability communications on a total of 125 criteria.
For more information on the Online Sustainability Research visit our sustainability section.
| Rank | Company | Country | Score |
| 1 | BASF | Germany | 67% |
| 2 | BHP Billiton | UK / Australia | 65% |
| 3 | Centrica | UK | 64% |
| 4 | Novo Nordisk | Denmark | 64% |
| 5 | BP | UK | 64% |
| 6 | Vodafone Group | UK | 62% |
| 7 | Bayer | Germany | 58% |
| 8 | Deutsche Post | Germany | 58% |
| 9 | DSM | the Netherlands | 57% |
| 10 | Daimler Chrysler | Germany | 56% |
| 11 | Kesko | Finland | 55% |
| 12 | ABB Group | Switzerland | 55% |
| 13 | Unilever | the Netherlands / UK | 54% |
| 14 | Veolia Environnement | France | 53% |
| 15 | Anglo American | UK | 53% |
| 16 | Lafarge | France | 53% |
| 17 | Telecom Italia | Italia | 53% |
| 18 | Tesco | UK | 52% |
| 19 | Aviva | UK | 52% |
| 20 | SAB Miller | UK | 52% |
| 21 | British American Tobacco | UK | 52% |
| 22 | National Grid | UK | 52% |
| 23 | Adidas | Germany | 52% |
| 24 | Renault | France | 52% |
| 25 | Xstrata | UK | 51% |
| 26 | Henkel | Germany | 51% |
| 27 | J Sainsbury | UK | 51% |
| 28 | Stora Enso | Finland | 50% |
| 29 | Royal Dutch Shell | the Netherlands / UK | 49% |
| 30 | Metso | Finland | 49% |
| 31 | Roche | Switzerland | 49% |
| 32 | Telenor | Norway | 48% |
| 33 | Siemens | Germany | 48% |
| 34 | BMW Group | Germany | 48% |
| 35 | Statoil | Norway | 47% |
| 36 | Total | France | 47% |
| 37 | SKF | Sweden | 46% |
| 38 | Danisco | Denmark | 42% |
| 39 | Pearson | UK | 42% |
| 40 | Deutsche Telekom | Germany | 41% |
| 41 | United Utilities | UK | 41% |
| 42 | Akzo Nobel | the Netherlands | 40% |
| 43 | ABN Amro | the Netherlands | 40% |
| 44 | Kingfisher | UK | 40% |
| 45 | UBS | Switzerland | 39% |
| 46 | Balfour Beatty | UK | 39% |
| 47 | Severn Trent | UK | 38% |
| 48 | Barclays | UK | 38% |
| 49 | Syngenta | Switzerland | 37% |
| 50 | Sodexho | France | 37% |
| 51 | Siwsscom | Switzerland | 34% |
| 52 | Alcatel Lucent | France | 32% |
| 53 | Accor | France | 23% |
Comments
Good research by the way
thanks for your response.
The top 5 are chemical / energy / mining companies indeed. It might be that those companies feel more obliged to communicate about their impact on mankind and the environment (and therefore put more effort in it).
One of the most interesting conclusions in our opinion is that companies start to make use of multimedia in a relevant / functional way (interviews, visualizing production processes). A couple of years ago companies were mainly using (stock) images of animals and poor people in developing countries.
Geert Jan
The assignment finishes in 4 days
Thank you